Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos852 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Miami Hurricanes results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, In-Group Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28.6% saturation with 899 hits. Analysis detected 5,852 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,148 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (4,546 of 16,562 topics). This Miami Hurricanes is worse (more manipulative) than 72.60% of the peer group.
Miami Hurricanes
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,148
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

73% percentile
025507510072.6% percentile
4.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 28.6%28.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.0%11.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 13.6%13.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.7%8.7%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 7.9%7.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.8%1.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.7%4.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 28.6%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 2.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 3.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Recency Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.0%Straw Man: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos