Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video532 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mexican Cartel Violence results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 207 hits. Analysis detected 1,382 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,128 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (6,884 of 16,562 topics). This Mexican Cartel Violence is worse (more manipulative) than 58.40% of the peer group.
Mexican Cartel Violence
Topic details
Total words: 2,128
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510058.4% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.7%9.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 9.5%9.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.3%7.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos