Topic summary
⁠48%2 analyzed articles/videos875 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Methamphetamine results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 256 hits. Analysis detected 2,545 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,625 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (7,682 of 16,197 topics). This Methamphetamine is worse (more manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group.
Methamphetamine
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,625
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

53% percentile
025507510052.6% percentile
3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.1%7.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 9.8%9.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.7%2.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 4.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Special Pleading: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos