Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video878 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Melanocytes results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Biased Writer Voice, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 299 hits. Analysis detected 1,888 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,512 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (12,753 of 16,562 topics). This Melanocytes is better (less manipulative) than 77.00% of the peer group.
Melanocytes
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,512
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

23% percentile
025507510023.0% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.1%6.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 6.1%6.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.1%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Composition/Division: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.4%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos