Topic summary
⁠96%1 analyzed article/video157 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Melanie Martinez results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Optimism Bias, and Anecdotal, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 24.2% saturation with 152 hits. Analysis detected 981 faulty-reasoning hits from 628 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12% and a BS Rank of ⁠97% (863 of 23,184 topics). This Melanie Martinez is worse (more manipulative) than 96.30% of the peer group.
Melanie Martinez
Topic details
Total words: 628
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

96% percentile
025507510096.3% percentile
12.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles628 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 23.9%23.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 24.2%24.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.7%3.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.2%14.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 12.1%12.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 16.1%16.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 14.8%14.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.0%10.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 8.0%8.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Topic 24.2%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 23.9%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 1.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 6.9%Recency Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos