Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Medical Workforce results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Anecdotal , and Appeal to Emotion , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 3% saturation with 172 hits . Analysis detected 1,237 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,781 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Medical Workforce is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Medical Workforce
Topic details
Total words: 5,781
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.8% Special Pleading: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.3% No True Scotsman: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst