Topic summary
41%2 analyzed articles/videos1,687 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Medical Care results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Anecdotal, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 585 hits. Analysis detected 4,080 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,906 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 16% (13,105 of 15,447 topics). This Medical Care is better (less manipulative) than 84.80% of the peer group.
Medical Care
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,906
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

15% percentile
025507510015.2% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.9%9.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 8.0%8.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos