Topic summary
41% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,687 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Medical Care results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Anecdotal , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 585 hits . Analysis detected 4,080 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,906 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 16% (13,105 of 15,447 topics). This Medical Care is better (less manipulative) than 84.80% of the peer group. Medical Care
Topic details
Total words: 5,906
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.2% percentile 1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 8.0% 8.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst