Topic summary
78% 6 analyzed articles/videos 5,005 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Medicaid Fraud results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Self-Serving Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 1,817 hits . Analysis detected 17,710 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,023 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (12,500 of 15,690 topics). This Medicaid Fraud is better (less manipulative) than 79.70% of the peer group. Medicaid Fraud
Topic details
Total words: 18,023
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.3% percentile 1.9% BS Score6 analyzed articles18K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.1% 10.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 3.7% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Burden of Proof: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst