Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,061 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Medicaid And Medicare Funding results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 42.6% saturation with 1,355 hits. Analysis detected 9,171 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,180 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (1,543 of 16,562 topics). This Medicaid And Medicare Funding is worse (more manipulative) than 90.70% of the peer group.
Medicaid And Medicare Funding
Topic details
Total words: 3,180
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

91% percentile
025507510090.7% percentile
9.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 36.9%36.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 35.4%35.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 42.6%42.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 18.0%18.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 19.7%19.7%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 12.4%12.4%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 10.7%10.7%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 9.1%9.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 18.3%18.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 13.9%13.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 42.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 36.9%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 35.4%, sitewide 19.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 19.7%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 18.3%, sitewide 11.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 18.0%, sitewide 2.5%Confirmation Bias: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 7.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 3.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 1.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Begging the Question: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 1.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 1.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.9%Straw Man: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 0.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos