Topic summary
⁠5%1 analyzed article/video1,879 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Md Anderson Cancer Center results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 332 hits. Analysis detected 1,446 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,637 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (16,341 of 16,562 topics). This Md Anderson Cancer Center is better (less manipulative) than 98.70% of the peer group.
Md Anderson Cancer Center
Topic details
Total words: 5,637
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

1% percentile
02550751001.3% percentile
1.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.9%5.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Special Pleading: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.3%Red Herring: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.7%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos