Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos82 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Mahan results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Optimism Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 448 hits. Analysis detected 3,393 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,674 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (9,191 of 16,562 topics). This Matt Mahan is better (less manipulative) than 55.50% of the peer group.
Matt Mahan
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510044.5% percentile
2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.2%12.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.8%6.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.3%10.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.7%3.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos