Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,247 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mathematics And Literature results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Anecdotal, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 460 hits. Analysis detected 2,536 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,741 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (10,404 of 16,486 topics). This Mathematics And Literature is better (less manipulative) than 63.10% of the peer group.
Mathematics And Literature
Topic details
Total words: 3,741
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510036.9% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.3%12.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Nature: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Circular Reasoning: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos