Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,024 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maternal Mental Health results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 824 hits. Analysis detected 3,291 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,096 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (8,592 of 16,562 topics). This Maternal Mental Health is better (less manipulative) than 51.90% of the peer group.
Maternal Mental Health
Topic details
Total words: 4,096
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

48% percentile
025507510048.1% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 20.1%20.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.6%9.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.6%7.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Anecdotal: Topic 20.1%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.6%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.6%Horn Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.0%Red Herring: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.7%Indoctrination: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos