Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,060 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maternal Care results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 254 hits. Analysis detected 2,075 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,120 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (6,309 of 16,562 topics). This Maternal Care is worse (more manipulative) than 61.90% of the peer group.
Maternal Care
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,120
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510061.9% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.3%9.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 10.6%10.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.0%12.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 10.6%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos