Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video807 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matchmaking results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 22.9% saturation with 555 hits. Analysis detected 5,646 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,421 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (1,552 of 16,562 topics). This Matchmaking is worse (more manipulative) than 90.60% of the peer group.
Matchmaking
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,421
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

91% percentile
025507510090.6% percentile
9.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 22.7%22.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 22.9%22.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 19.4%19.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 10.4%10.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.1%9.1%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 8.8%8.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 16.9%16.9%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Topic 5.3%5.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 12.3%12.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 22.5%22.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 22.5%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 22.9%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Topic 22.7%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.4%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 19.4%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 1.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 6.0%Recency Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 2.7%Halo Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.2%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Nature: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.2%Bandwagon: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos