Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video589 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mass Casualty Event results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Hasty Generalization, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 176 hits. Analysis detected 1,063 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,356 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 25% (12,444 of 16,562 topics). This Mass Casualty Event is better (less manipulative) than 75.10% of the peer group.
Mass Casualty Event
Topic details
Total words: 2,356
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

25% percentile
025507510024.9% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.5%7.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos