Topic summary
34% 2 analyzed articles/videos 6,011 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marxist Theory results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 2,094 hits . Analysis detected 19,732 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,270 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (12,634 of 16,562 topics). This Marxist Theory is better (less manipulative) than 76.30% of the peer group. Marxist Theory
Topic details
Total words: 22,270
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.7% percentile 2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles22.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.1% 0.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 2.0% Halo Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst