Topic summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video449 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marvel Studios results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.7% saturation with 279 hits. Analysis detected 2,009 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,347 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (3,398 of 16,562 topics). This Marvel Studios is worse (more manipulative) than 79.50% of the peer group.
Marvel Studios
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,347
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

80% percentile
025507510079.5% percentile
5.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 19.8%19.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 12.7%12.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.7%6.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.8%12.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.7%2.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 10.6%10.6%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.7%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 19.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos