Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos892 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Martin Scorsese results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 25.6% saturation with 855 hits. Analysis detected 4,025 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,342 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (4,115 of 15,690 topics). This Martin Scorsese is worse (more manipulative) than 73.80% of the peer group.
Martin Scorsese
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,342
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

74% percentile
025507510073.8% percentile
4.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 25.6%25.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.2%16.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 22.6%22.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 8.2%8.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 16.2%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Topic 25.6%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 22.6%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos