Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video298 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Martha Maccallum Interviews results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Availability Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 84.8% saturation with 758 hits. Analysis detected 3,181 faulty-reasoning hits from 894 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 19.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠99% (245 of 16,562 topics). This Martha Maccallum Interviews is worse (more manipulative) than 98.50% of the peer group.
Martha Maccallum Interviews
Topic details
Total words: 894
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

99% percentile
025507510098.5% percentile
19.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles894 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 84.8%84.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 71.1%71.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 35.4%35.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 26.4%26.4%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 17.7%17.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 32.3%32.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 23.7%23.7%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 13.0%13.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 14.5%14.5%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Framing Effect: Topic 84.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 71.1%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 35.4%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 32.3%, sitewide 19.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 26.4%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Topic 23.7%, sitewide 11.1%Bandwagon: Topic 17.7%, sitewide 2.2%Halo Effect: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 6.7%Begging the Question: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 1.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.5%Horn Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos