Topic summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,171 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marketing Strategy results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Indoctrination, and Biased Writer Voice, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 21.6% saturation with 1,510 hits. Analysis detected 10,249 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,980 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 62% (6,409 of 16,562 topics). This Marketing Strategy is worse (more manipulative) than 61.30% of the peer group.
Marketing Strategy
Topic details
Total words: 6,980
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

61% percentile
025507510061.3% percentile
3.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.5%8.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 21.6%21.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.6%6.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 9.4%9.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 8.2%8.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 8.3%8.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 7.6%7.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 10.0%10.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 21.6%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 5.3%False Dilemma: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 7.6%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate