Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video2,763 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Market Theory results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 1,381 hits. Analysis detected 8,616 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,052 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (12,436 of 16,562 topics). This Market Theory is better (less manipulative) than 75.10% of the peer group.
Market Theory
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 11,052
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

25% percentile
025507510024.9% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles11.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.5%12.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.8%6.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.2%0.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos