Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video377 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Market Risk results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Anchoring Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 85.3% saturation with 965 hits. Analysis detected 4,554 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,131 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠97% (493 of 16,562 topics). This Market Risk is worse (more manipulative) than 97.00% of the peer group.
Market Risk
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,131
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

97% percentile
025507510097.0% percentile
15.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 85.3%85.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 54.9%54.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 26.9%26.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 35.6%35.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 24.4%24.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 19.1%19.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 15.3%15.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 19.8%19.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 9.3%9.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 14.0%14.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Framing Effect: Topic 85.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 54.9%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 35.6%, sitewide 19.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 26.9%, sitewide 4.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 24.4%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 19.8%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 19.1%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 15.3%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 6.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 3.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.5%Composition/Division: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos