Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 3,763 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Market Humanism results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 2,039 hits . Analysis detected 12,461 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,289 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (9,803 of 16,111 topics). This Market Humanism is better (less manipulative) than 60.80% of the peer group. Market Humanism
Topic details
Total words: 11,289
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.2% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles11.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 18.1% 18.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 7.6% 7.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Topic 18.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 2.0% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.8%, sitewide 3.3% Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.2% Straw Man: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.9% False Dilemma: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Begging the Question: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst