Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,255 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Market Dynamics results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 1,420 hits . Analysis detected 8,348 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,020 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 33% (11,007 of 16,245 topics). This Market Dynamics is better (less manipulative) than 67.80% of the peer group. Market Dynamics
Topic details
Total words: 9,020
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.2% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 15.7% 15.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Begging the Question: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst