Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video254 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Zuckerberg results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Anecdotal, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 194 hits. Analysis detected 824 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,016 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of ā 74% (4,226 of 16,245 topics). This Mark Zuckerberg is worse (more manipulative) than 74.00% of the peer group.
Mark Zuckerberg
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 74%Mark Zuckerberg (selected)5%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 1,016
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

74% percentile
025507510074.0% percentile
4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 19.1%19.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.8%6.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Topic 4.5%4.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.3%2.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 19.1%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 4.6%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos