Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video554 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maritime Incidents results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 298 hits. Analysis detected 1,496 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,216 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (7,016 of 16,562 topics). This Maritime Incidents is worse (more manipulative) than 57.60% of the peer group.
Maritime Incidents
Topic details
Total words: 2,216
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510057.6% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.4%13.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 12.1%12.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.4%12.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.6%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos