Topic summary
⁠86%2 analyzed articles/videos309 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maritime Embargo results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 21% saturation with 195 hits. Analysis detected 991 faulty-reasoning hits from 927 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (1,784 of 16,562 topics). This Maritime Embargo is worse (more manipulative) than 89.20% of the peer group.
Maritime Embargo
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠90%Maritime Embargo (selected)9%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 927
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

89% percentile
025507510089.2% percentile
8.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles927 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 14.2%14.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 10.0%10.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.7%12.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 21.0%21.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 6.2%6.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 7.3%7.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 21.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 1.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 10.0%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Recency Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.2%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos