Topic summary
⁠94%1 analyzed article/video731 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marina results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 26.6% saturation with 584 hits. Analysis detected 2,227 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,193 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (5,359 of 16,562 topics). This Marina is worse (more manipulative) than 67.60% of the peer group.
Marina
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠68%Marina (selected)5%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,193
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

68% percentile
025507510067.6% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.1%13.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.0%11.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.8%1.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 26.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.4%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos