Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video495 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maps results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, In-Group Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 116 hits. Analysis detected 376 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,980 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (10,653 of 16,562 topics). This Maps is better (less manipulative) than 64.30% of the peer group.
Maps
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,980
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510035.7% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.6%1.6%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 5.9%5.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos