Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video443 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Make America Skilled Again results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 56.9% saturation with 756 hits. Analysis detected 4,845 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,329 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠96% (788 of 16,562 topics). This Make America Skilled Again is worse (more manipulative) than 95.20% of the peer group.
Make America Skilled Again
Topic details
Total words: 1,329
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

95% percentile
025507510095.2% percentile
12.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 52.0%52.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 56.9%56.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 30.2%30.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 34.0%34.0%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 24.8%24.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.1%4.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 18.1%18.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 14.3%14.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 12.6%12.6%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Topic 9.1%9.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 56.9%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 52.0%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 34.0%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 30.2%, sitewide 3.7%Red Herring: Topic 24.8%, sitewide 0.7%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 19.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 18.1%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 14.3%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 11.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 4.0%Special Pleading: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 0.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.2%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 1.4%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.4%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 4.6%Burden of Proof: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos