Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Make A Wish Foundation results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 442 hits. Analysis detected 1,994 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,379 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Make A Wish Foundation is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Make A Wish Foundation
Topic details
Total words: 2,379
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 18.6%18.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 11.5%11.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Composition/Division: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.1%Indoctrination: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos