Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Major League Baseball results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Indoctrination , and Ad Hominem , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 466 hits . Analysis detected 4,404 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,453 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 15,897 topics). This Major League Baseball is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Major League Baseball
Topic details
Total words: 3,453
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 9.9% 9.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.3% 11.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 7.8% 7.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 13.5% 13.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.6%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Bandwagon: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst