Topic summary
⁠88%1 analyzed article/video663 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mac results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.8% saturation with 414 hits. Analysis detected 2,372 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,989 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (4,265 of 16,562 topics). This Mac is worse (more manipulative) than 74.30% of the peer group.
Mac
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,989
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

74% percentile
025507510074.3% percentile
4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.5%8.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 14.9%14.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 7.9%7.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 8.0%8.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 6.1%6.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 1.5%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 5.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 1.7%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 0.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos