Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,383 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lyme Disease results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Hasty Generalization, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 831 hits. Analysis detected 7,379 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,836 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (13,301 of 16,559 topics). This Lyme Disease is better (less manipulative) than 80.30% of the peer group.
Lyme Disease
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 8,836
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

20% percentile
025507510019.7% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.1%8.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.2%4.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 9.4%9.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos