Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,796 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Luxury Real Estate results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 27.4% saturation with 2,374 hits. Analysis detected 13,077 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,656 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (4,330 of 16,558 topics). This Luxury Real Estate is worse (more manipulative) than 73.90% of the peer group.
Luxury Real Estate
Topic details
Total words: 8,656
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

74% percentile
025507510073.9% percentile
4.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 27.4%27.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 23.9%23.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.8%3.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 20.3%20.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.6%15.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.1%8.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 27.4%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Topic 23.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 20.3%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos