Topic summary
53%2 analyzed articles/videos706 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Luxury Homes results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Biased Writer Voice, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 602 hits. Analysis detected 4,078 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,501 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 46% (9,095 of 16,562 topics). This Luxury Homes is better (less manipulative) than 54.90% of the peer group.
Luxury Homes
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,501
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510045.1% percentile
2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.6%5.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 8.0%8.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 13.4%13.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 0.5%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate