Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video390 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lsu Tigers results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 74% saturation with 577 hits. Analysis detected 3,708 faulty-reasoning hits from 780 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 17.6% and a BS Rank of ā 98% (346 of 16,562 topics). This Lsu Tigers is worse (more manipulative) than 97.90% of the peer group.
Lsu Tigers
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 98%Lsu Tigers (selected)18%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 780
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

98% percentile
025507510097.9% percentile
17.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles780 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 74.0%74.0%Fundamental Attribution Eā€¦Sitewide 2.7%Topic 40.0%40.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 38.0%38.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 49.6%49.6%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 24.9%24.9%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Topic 22.2%22.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 27.7%27.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 22.1%22.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 22.9%22.9%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 18.5%18.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Negativity Bias: Topic 74.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 49.6%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Topic 40.1%, sitewide 26.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 40.0%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 38.0%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 27.7%, sitewide 8.1%Horn Effect: Topic 24.9%, sitewide 1.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 22.9%, sitewide 7.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 22.2%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Topic 22.1%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 18.5%, sitewide 3.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 17.2%, sitewide 4.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 6.9%Red Herring: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 0.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 9.1%Bandwagon: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 1.7%Halo Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos