Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video147 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lower House Seats results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 72 hits. Analysis detected 535 faulty-reasoning hits from 588 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (2,075 of 16,342 topics). This Lower House Seats is worse (more manipulative) than 87.30% of the peer group.
Lower House Seats
Topic details
Total words: 588
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

87% percentile
025507510087.3% percentile
7.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles588 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.1%11.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.8%7.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 8.7%8.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.2%12.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.9%11.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 8.0%8.0%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 7.8%7.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 8.0%8.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 1.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 2.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos