Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Louisiana Supreme Court results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Loss Aversion, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 69 hits. Analysis detected 320 faulty-reasoning hits from 807 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Louisiana Supreme Court is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Louisiana Supreme Court
Topic details
Total words: 807
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles807 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.6%8.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.6%2.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 4.5%4.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.9%1.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 1.7%1.7%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 1.7%1.7%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.4%Indoctrination: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos