Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video851 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lottery Winner results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 551 hits. Analysis detected 3,000 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,404 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (8,025 of 16,562 topics). This Lottery Winner is worse (more manipulative) than 51.50% of the peer group.
Lottery Winner
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,404
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510051.5% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 16.2%16.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos