Topic summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video973 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Los Angeles City Government results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 337 hits. Analysis detected 2,273 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,919 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (7,378 of 16,562 topics). This Los Angeles City Government is worse (more manipulative) than 55.50% of the peer group.
Los Angeles City Government
Topic details
Total words: 2,919
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510055.5% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.6%10.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.6%11.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 9.3%9.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.4%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.9%Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.1%No True Scotsman: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos