Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video592 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Looting results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.8% saturation with 539 hits. Analysis detected 2,233 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,368 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (5,980 of 16,562 topics). This Looting is worse (more manipulative) than 63.90% of the peer group.
Looting
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,368
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

64% percentile
025507510063.9% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.1%10.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 22.8%22.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 22.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Red Herring: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos