Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video926 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Local Government Partnerships results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 265 hits. Analysis detected 2,011 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,704 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (12,653 of 16,562 topics). This Local Government Partnerships is better (less manipulative) than 76.40% of the peer group.
Local Government Partnerships
Topic details
Total words: 3,704
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

24% percentile
025507510023.6% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 6.1%6.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.1%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos