Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Local Government Funding results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Loss Aversion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 382 hits. Analysis detected 3,158 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,060 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Local Government Funding is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Local Government Funding
Topic details
Total words: 6,060
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.3%6.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.9%0.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Circular Reasoning: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos