Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,643 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Local Eateries results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 33.1% saturation with 2,176 hits. Analysis detected 8,384 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,572 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (7,059 of 16,562 topics). This Local Eateries is worse (more manipulative) than 57.40% of the peer group.
Local Eateries
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,572
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510057.4% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 33.1%33.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.9%5.9%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 12.1%12.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 33.1%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 15.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 2.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos