Topic summary
⁠84%1 analyzed article/video1,850 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Live Events results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Halo Effect, and In-Group Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.2% saturation with 1,290 hits. Analysis detected 6,075 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,550 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (6,047 of 15,886 topics). This Live Events is worse (more manipulative) than 61.90% of the peer group.
Live Events
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,550
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510061.9% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 23.2%23.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 9.6%9.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.0%8.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.7%3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 23.2%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos