Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video748 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Liv Golf Funding results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 490 hits. Analysis detected 4,053 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,992 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (3,476 of 16,562 topics). This Liv Golf Funding is worse (more manipulative) than 79.00% of the peer group.
Liv Golf Funding
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,992
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

79% percentile
025507510079.0% percentile
5.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 9.5%9.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 7.7%7.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.4%11.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 13.4%13.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 9.5%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Recency Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.3%Composition/Division: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos