Topic summary
⁠54%1 analyzed article/video1,138 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Literary World results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 653 hits. Analysis detected 4,975 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,552 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (9,506 of 15,856 topics). This Literary World is better (less manipulative) than 59.90% of the peer group.
Literary World
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,552
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

40% percentile
025507510040.1% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.7%8.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 14.3%14.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.2%10.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 3.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.0%Straw Man: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 0.9%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos