Topic summary
⁠19%1 analyzed article/video855 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lists results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Availability Heuristic, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 228 hits. Analysis detected 1,883 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,420 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (12,075 of 16,562 topics). This Lists is better (less manipulative) than 72.90% of the peer group.
Lists
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,420
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

27% percentile
025507510027.1% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.7%6.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.7%2.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Tu Quoque: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Begging the Question: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Special Pleading: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos